Stolen credit card http://katkov.dev/precio-metformina-500-whrq metformin al 1000 preis To test their theory, Minson and Chen ran two studies. In the first one, they observed 20 students watching videos of people making arguments about controversial subjects like quotas for hiring women, assisted suicide and a nuclear power phase-out. They tested various scenarios, including instances where the students were pre-disposed to agree with the speaker or to disagree. Through eye tracking, they measured whether the students were looking at the speakers in the eye. In some of the videos the speakers stared directly at the camera. In others, they gazed out at a 45-degree angle. What Minson and Chen found: In cases where the students disagreed with the speakersテ「ツツ� positions at the outset, direct eye contact made them less likely to change their minds. テ「ツツ廬n cases where participants made more eye contact, they were less persuaded,テ「ツツ� says Minson.
(携帯) |